Day 5 of sugar ban. I feel like I’m in trainspotting.
Preach that shit, baby.
BUT REALLY READ THIS IN HIS “SINGING” VOICE ITS ACtually only kind of funny… Goddamnit.
ily roger
That’s what I’ve been saying all along hahaha! I’m not sure if it’s a good thing that we think alike.
Paul Mitchell tests on prison inmates~
(Source: lugosi666)
(Source: robinmbrowne, via veganpenis)
人体结构素描 (Human Anatomy Sketches)
I have THE biggest crush on Stephen fry
(Source: poisonouschicken, via fuckyeahdementia)
(Source: eatsleepdraw)
Martin Sharp
(Source: photographyartanddesignblog)
… suppose, suppose this: the child—is he seven years old, or eight perhaps?—standing by the window, drawing the curtain and, through the pane, looking. What he sees: the garden, the wintry trees, the wall of a house. Though he sees, no doubt in a child’s way, his play space, he grows weary and slowly looks up towards the ordinary sky, with clouds, grey light—pallid daylight without depth.
What happens then: the sky, the same sky, suddenly open, absolutely black and absolutely empty, revealing (as though the pane had broken) such an absence that all has since always and forever been lost therein—so lost that therein is affirmed the vertiginous knowledge that nothing is what there is, and first of all nothing beyond. The unexpected aspect of this scene (its interminable feature) is the feeling of happiness that straightaway submerges the child, the ravaging joy to which he can bear witness only by tears, an endless flood of tears. He is thought to suffer a childish sorrow; attempts are made to console him. He says nothing. He will live henceforth in the secret. He will weep no more….
Let me continue to emphasize the banality; the circumstances are of this world—the tree, the wall, the winter garden, the play space and with it, lassitude; then time is introduced, and its discourse: the recountable is either without any episode of note, or else purely episodic. Indeed, the sky, in the cosmic dimensions it takes on as soon as it is named—the stars, the universe—brings only the clarity of parsimonious daylight, even if this were to be construed as the “fiat lux.”—It is a distantness that is not distant.—Nevertheless the same sky …—Exactly, it has to be the same.—Nothing has changed.—Except the overwhelming overturning of nothing.—Which breaks, by the smashing of a pane (behind which one rests assured of perfect, of protected, visibility), the finite-infinite space of the cosmos—ordinary order—the better to substitute the knowing vertigo of the deserted outside. Blackness and void, responding to the suddenness of the opening and giving themselves unalloyed, announce the revelation of the outside by absence, loss and the lack of any beyond….
—
Maurice Blanchot- The Writing of the Disaster
Writing 68?
<3 This makes me tingle
How perfectly goddamned delightful it all is, to be sure.
—Charles Crumb (via a-dead-astronaut-in-space)
(Source: thisisdedicatedtoyoubenstiller)





